Miller Creek Flood Plain Revision and
Crossing Feasibility Study
Department of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ
Mike Carroll, Gordon Hastings, Brian Kunk
Hydrology
Crossing Feasibility
Federal Insurance Rate Map
Special Thanks go to:
The first step when designing any structure in an active channel is to replicate the hydraulic model used to construct the current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The FIRM for this study area was completed using the US Army Corps of Engineers Hydraulic Engineering Center’s HEC-2 hydraulic modeling program. Unfortunately, FEMA could not provide the HEC-2 data for the study area within the time limits of this project. Therefore the model could not be replicated. This prevented the calibration of the hydraulic model the team created using the Hydraulic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) program with the model (HEC-2) used to create the current FIRM.`
The inability to calibrate the new model requires more documentation regarding the discrepancies, if any, between the two mapped flood elevations. The missing HEC-2 model does not negatively affect the solution that BackWater has proposed using the HEC-RAS model of Miller Creek.
Conclusion
Abstract
The purpose of the project is to revise the current hydraulic model of a portion of Miller Creek, north of Prescott, and to conduct an elevated crossing conceptual design to replace a current low water crossing. The intent is to reduce the instance of conflicts between stormwater runoff and human activity.
The current floodplain model is out of date with respect to the hydraulic and hydrologic methods and technology used by floodplain managers today. In addition, the current low water crossing is dangerous to motorists and pedestrians during moderate to extreme storm events. The goal of Backwater Engineering is to       produce an accurate      hydraulic model of the     10, 25 and 100 year        events being contained          within Miller Creek and       to produce a conceptual            design of an elevated     crossing within the        vicinity of Lincoln      Avenue. The City of      Prescott will further utilize the outcomes of the project to improve their city-wide floodplain database and to eventually completely design and build an elevated crossing.
The analysis of Miller Creek began by determining the design flowrates that were to be used in the hydraulic model. The City of Prescott provided BackWater with a set of design flowrates for the 10, 25 and 100 year events along Miller Creek. In addition to the provided design flows, Backwater performed a simplified hydrologic study of the two watersheds of interest and produced an accessory set of design flowrates for the 10, 25 and 100 year storms.
There are two main watersheds, Miller and Butte that contribute to the conveyance of Miller Creek within the project area. The two watersheds collectively maintain ten square miles of land area consisting of similar land uses and soil strata.
The two sets of data were
comparable within 17%
difference for the Miller
watershed and 55%
difference for the Butte
watershed. The percent
differences were
acceptable but it was
decided, in coordination with the client, that the provided design flowrates should be used to produce the hydraulic model.
NAU_PrimV_CEFNS_2C.png
Hydraulics
BackWater Engineering found the major safety concerns for the current low water crossing to be: 
•Extended period of road closure 
•Unsafe driving conditions due to ice and water on the roadway.
•The presence of a steep approach leading to Miller Valley Rd.
•The possibility of flash flooding and stranded motorists. 
•Lack of turnaround area when crossing is closed.
The environmental concerns are:
•Excessive soil erosion.
•Contaminants due to vehicles traveling through.
 
BackWater Engineering assessed different locations to find an alternate location with moderate constructability, low cost, and low traffic impact.  The current low water crossing location was considered for elevated crossing construction, but dismissed due to cost and traffic impacts.  BackWater Engineering recommends building an elevated crossing at Madison Ave. because this location provides minimal cost, minimal traffic impacts and average constructability.  The City of Prescott currently owns the right of way to construct a crossing at this location therefore is no required taking of private land. 
 
BackWater Engineering analyzed multiple box culverts using HEC-RAS.  A 24’ wide by 7’ tall culvert will convey the 100 year storm event while having weir flow of 1.2’above the crossing, and would cost approximately $ 108,000.00.   Two 20’ wide 7’ tall box culverts would fully convey the 100year storm event with no overtopping and have an approximate cost of                $ 137,000.00.
The discrepancies between the flood delineation on the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and the HEC-RAS modeled flood delineation cannot be reconciled without the missing HEC-2 data. This does not invalidate the constructed model, but adds additional documentation requirements to the project.
 
The length of crossing and intersecting flows from Butte Creek and Miller Creek make constructing an elevated crossing at Lincoln Ave prohibitively costly. A crossing at Madison Ave would be one third the length and not have to contend with converging stream flows. It is recommended that the City of Prescott construct an elevated crossing at Madison Avenue.
References
Mr. Greg Toth, City of Prescott Stormwater Manager
Ms. Ann-Marie Benz, Prescott Creeks
Dr. Bob Shinham, Technical Advisor
Dr. Wilbert Odem, Project Review
Dr. Joshua Hewes, Overall Project Guidance 
 
City of Prescott Stormwater Management Plan
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Guidelines
American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) – Geometric design of Highways and Streets (Green Book)
Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) Floodplain Hydraulic Modeling
Army Corps of Engineers Hydraulic Engineering Center River-Analysis System (HEC-RAS) Documentation
Army Corps of Engineers Hydraulic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC HMS) Documentation
A detailed roughness investigation is imperative to the accuracy of hydraulic models which represents the natural channel setting. Due to the variable
vegetation and landscape along Miller
Creek, BackWater has performed an
extensive field study of the channel
conditions currently within the study limits.
The conditions varied from very rough with
dense vegetation and rock outcrop to
partially smooth with no vegetation and a
sand bottom.
The 10, 25, 100 year precipitation events were hydraulically modeled to determine respective flood elevations and stream velocities for the portion of Miller
Creek within the project area. The
 hydraulic model of Miller Creek
consists of fifteen cross sections,
each of which represents the
geometric and roughness conditions
 of a portion of Miller Creek. The
hydraulic depth is found at each
successive cross section and interpolated in between to completely define the 10, 25 and 100 year water surface elevations.
197.JPG lincoln ave flooded
Miller Creek watershed
Butte Creek watershed